One of the most popular objects in the Cartoon Museum’s collection is a Spitting Image puppet of Roy Hattersley, complete with spit pipe!
Spitting Image, was a satirical puppet show which ran from 1984 to 1996, at its peak it was watched by 15 million people. Roy proved a popular character, in 2007 Hattersley even praised the puppet for putting the ‘spit’ in ‘Spitting Image’. The show returned in 2020 with new puppets including Donald Trump and Greta Thunberg on subscription service BritBox.
Although many museums have been closed over the pandemic, collections still need to be cared for as they can deteriorate over time. With thanks to a conservation grant, Roy has been off for a little ‘tlc’. In this blog, we find out more about the work involved in conserving this complex object.
Answers by Janie Lightfoot Textiles Conservation Team
How is the puppet constructed?
The Spitting Image caricature of Roy Hattersley is a life-size puppet made of a polyurethane foam main structure and painted latex foam for the figurative features, such as the face and the hands.
The puppet is completed with clothing, hair, glass or plastic eyes, plastic tubes and metal wires to perform the spitting and blinking features of the caricature. The various components head, torso, arms and hands are joined together by the means of metal rods bolted together and mounted on and a stainless-steel mannequin stand.
How do you approach the conservation of foam? Is it a difficult material to work with?
The best conservation treatment for synthetic foams is always preventive conservation.
Foams differ from each other in their care needs. The exact recipe of each, including its range of additives, influences how it will age, even the pigment used to colour an otherwise identical object can cause objects to age differently.
There are no standard interventive processes for foams. Interventive treatments present risks of further damage to objects due to potential reaction between treatment and object.
We base our approach on sound research in the field and thorough testing before carrying out any treatments. It’s also important sourcing materials that are conservation grade and have proofed aging qualities.
Have you ever conserved a puppet-like this before?
Yes, we have been fortunate enough to work on three other Spitting Image puppets – Margaret Thatcher, David Steel and Charles Kennedy for The Palace of Westminster
Could you explain some of the ethical decisions around conservation – Why stabilisation and prevention is favoured over replacing parts of a museum object?
Conservation seeks to avoid causing further harm, and stabilising and preventing further loss of significance, including that which is historic, cultural or artistic. Any actions should allow for future re-treatment and remain as reversible as possible.
Restoration is bringing back an object to a former position, which removes any trace of the passage of change and the elimination often of the social history of the object.
What was the most difficult part of the conservation process of this object?
The research on conservation of plastic is relatively new and on-going. Coming up with the right approach and materials to stabilise the degraded and powdering foam was quite challenging. Due to the crumbling nature of the foam, it was important to attempt to consolidate as deeply as possible, preferably throughout the entire thickness of the foam. The adhesive needed to be strong enough to withstand minimal handling while retaining the original flexibility, there were many aspects to consider.
How many hours have you spent working on the object?
The actual treatment of the puppet took around 36 hours on the bench plus the conservation of the clothing. This was preceded by hours of thorough analysis of the condition to narrow down the treatment options, testing of selected approach and materials, and preparation work, before starting the actual treatment.
What part of the process did you enjoy most when working on this puppet?
Observing the original material responding positively to the treatment, especially during the consolidation of the highly degraded foam, was the most fascinating part of the project and the one I found the most enjoyable. As there isn’t a foam equal to another, the reaction to a conservation treatment always retains a certain degree of unpredictability…and mystery.
By Claire Madge
The Cartoon Museum blogger in residence
With thanks to Janie Lightfoot Textiles.
Conservation generously facilitated by ICON’s Collections Care Stimulus Fund, made possible through the generous support of the Radcliffe Trust and others.